Curiosity review Þ 103

summary ¹ eBook or Kindle ePUB ☆ Philip Ball

CuriosityCe was lostYet this hasn't deterred us Today we spend vast sums trying to recreate the first instants of creation in particle accelerators out of pure desire to know There seems now to be no uestion too vast or too trivial to be ruled out of bounds Why can fleas jump so high What is gravity What shape are clouds Today Curiosity is no longer reviled but celebratedExamining how our inuisitive impulse first became sanctioned changing from a vice to a virtue Curiosity begins with the age.

Philip Ball ☆ 3 summary

When modern science began a time that spans the lives of Galileo and Isaac Newton It reveals a complex story in which the liberation and the taming of Curiosity was linked to magic religion literature travel trade and empireBy examining the rise of Curiosity we can ask what has become of it today how it functions in science how it is spun and packaged and sold how well it is being sustained and honoured and how the changing shape of science influences the kinds of uestions it may ask..

summary Curiosity

Curiosity review Þ 103 ´ [KINDLE] ✿ Curiosity Author Philip Ball – Citybreakscheap.co.uk There was a time when curiosity was condemned To be curious was to delve into matters that didn't concern you after all the original sin stemmed from a desire for forbidden knowledge Through curiosity There was a time when Curiosity was condemned To be curi[KINDLE] Curiosity Author Philip Ball Citybreakscheap.co.uk There was a time when curiosity was condemned To be curious was to delve into matters that didn't concern you after all the original sin stemmed from a desire for forbidden knowledge Through curiosity There was a time when Curiosity was condemned To be curious was to delve into matters that didn't concern you after all the original sin stemmed from a desire for forbidden knowledge Through Curiosity our innocen.

Curiosity review Þ 103 Philip Ball born is an English science writer He holds a degree in chemistry from Oxford and a doctorate in physics from Bristol University He was an editor for the journal Nature for over years He now writes a regular column in Chemistry World Ball's most popular book is the Critical Mass How One Things Leads to Another winner of the Aventis Prize for Science Books It e.

10 Comments on "Curiosity review Þ 103"

  • Elaine

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityIt is curious indeed that a curious person like me never thought that curiosity has a history I thought curiosity was something we're born with Indeed even my dogs are curious as were the racoon babies peering at us as we walked by their nest in the porch of a house in the middle of an inner city neighborhoodCuriously not only has curiosity got a history curiosity had been looked down upon by church and state The history of curiosity is the history of science in the Western World I love the history of science but after the first 200 or so pages curiously I was sick of curious peopleCuriously this is because Ball feels the need to mention such minor curious men that I never heard of Not so curiously I did know of the major and some minor curious men However curious as I am my curiosity failed me as the list of curious thinkers grew and the objects of their curiosity became curiously trivial In short this is well rese


  • Tom Quinn

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityThis took me such a long time to get into that I decided to abandon it The language was often dense and lofty which made the first chapters nearly inaccessible for me Plus the opening is mostly hair splitting about what the word curiosity meant in a variety of cultures contexts and languages So I was doing a lot of mental wandering and zoning out needing to back up and start pages paragraphs and sentences over Later on though when Ball finally gets to individual instances and players in the expansion of scientific literacy That's when this took off and became enjoyable But you have to sit through a lot of droning first and it never really clicked for me interest wise3 stars out of 5 Not my favorite Pop Science author by a long shot


  • Simon Mcleish

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityThis review first appeared on my blog hereHistories of what is known as the scientific revolution especially those who are writing for a popular audience tend to portray the development of modern science as something new a break from past thought about the world rather than a continuation of it It is as though despite Newton's oft uoted remark about the shoulders of giants the ideas of Copernicus Galileo Descartes and Newton and others in other fields came out of nowhere Inconvenient facts which show the continuing influence of earlier ideas such as Newton's interest in alchemy are left out or mentioned in passing in an embarrassed mannerThe purpose of Ball's book is to show something of the continuous nature of the development of the philosophical ideas which led to the seventeenth century appearance of modern science in embryonic form Os


  • Gavin

    Curiosity review Þ 103 Curiosity —why is the sea salty—have animals souls or intelligence —has opinion its foundation in the animate body —why do human beings not have horns —how is it that sound in its passage makes its way through any obstacle whatever —how is it that joy can be the cause of tears —why are the fingers of uneual length —why if you have intercourse with a woman after she has lain with a leper will you catch the disease while she will escape —what reason is there for the universality of death —why do we need food so freuently or at all —why are the living afraid of the bodies of the dead—how is the globe supported in the middle of the air —why does the inflow of the rivers not increase the bulk of the ocean —why if a vessel be full and its lower part open does water not issue from it unless the upper lid be first removed —when one atom is moved are all mov


  • Peter (Pete) Mcloughlin

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityCuriosity was considered a vice in the middle ages and before It is a cardinal virtue in science these days It is a term of praise This book takes a look at the scientific revolution in the 17th century and charts the rising fortunes of curiosity and wonder This is also a good history of the scientific revolution with a large cast Galileo Kepler Newton Bacon Boyle Hooke Lippershays Pepys and almost every notable natural philosopher of the time This is a crucial period in Western civilization and ultimately world civilization We slowly formed from pre scientific superstition and scholasticism the beginings of the scientific world view Philip Ball keeps the story interesting by showing the relationships between these people


  • Todd Stockslager

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityReview title What do we really want to knowAuthor Ball frames a fascinating subject what do we want to know what should we want to know what is and isn't appropriate to know What does science want to know and why what does theology want us to know what to accept by faith and what never to uestion All of these uestions Ball categorizes as curiosity in this deep and sometimes too dense study of the history of science and the scientific revolution which Ball states was neitherIn part as a corrective for those who believe that science developed out of and distinct from magic alchemy and natural philosophy in a small defined set of events in clear contrast to those past and concurrent ways of thinking Ball shows how these ways of thinking all overlapped and intertwined in their subject matter and methods Ball documents h


  • Angie Reisetter

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityA great history of the so called scientific revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries He examines the main characters and ideas in the revolution and their cultural context It's pretty academic in tone which is okay but it's far of a history book than a book about the evolution of curiosity There are sections on curiosity how


  • Bruce

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityIf ever there was a book I should give 5 to this is it Unfortunately it is superbly written from a syntax standpoint but totally unengaging If anything it is a 3 dB tougher read than Vom Kreig The subject is not only enthralling but critically important to our civilization Admittedly it is complex so the author can be forgiven IMHO for not uite managing to integrate a story I recommend this strongly for any scientist who is an actual nerd and not just a careerist geek


  • Nathan Albright

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityI must admit that this book's best uality is probably the author's ambivalence about what he is talking about  To be sure I have a very different perspective on science and curiosity and their larger cultural matters and this book does a good job at reminding the reader if such a reminder is necessary that science has always carried with it a large amount of baggage relating to the larger culture and its own


  • Tlaura

    Curiosity review Þ 103 CuriosityA mixed bag for me Some chapters were fascinating others dull or misleading The best parts were Ball's takes on the literary responses to the scientific revolution in England chapters 8 and 12 first the slew of Moone books that appeared starting in the 1630s speculating about the possibility of life on the moon; second the satirical tradition that emerged in the later part of the 17th century as a reaction to virtuoso Whiggish Puritan culture the last and most famous example of which is Gulliver's Travels Ball has strong opinions about the various works he surveys and is an entertaining critic Chapter 2 on the tradition of renaissance natural magic was also uite good and why I bought the book after reading the preview on Google Books Ball champions non tradition